Julie Pastikova vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How have the players been performing on their second serve recently? Anouck Vrancken Peeters wins 40.26% of her second serve points, slightly ahead of Julie Pastikova, who wins 38.00%.
• In recent forms, how do they compare when facing opponents' second serves? Anouck captures 51.40% while Julie takes 50.70% of opponent second serve points, an indicator that slightly favors Anouck.
• When it comes to returning first serves, Anouck Vrancken Peeters holds a slight edge, winning 34.79% compared to Julie Pastikova's 33.83%.
• What about their breakpoint-saving ability under pressure? Anouck is marginally better at saving breakpoints, with a success rate of 50.61% against Julie's 47.57%.
• Reviewing match performance over the last year, Anouck Vrancken Peeters boasts a 70.13% win rate, narrowly surpassing Julie Pastikova's 67.44%.
• Both players excel on indoor hard courts with identical career wins of 80%, though their weakest performances differ: Anouck on Grass (0%) and Julie on Clay (58%).
• Analyzing matches at the Challenger/ITF levels over the previous year, Julie holds a small advantage, winning 66.67% compared to Anouck's 64.81%.
• The quality of opponents faced by both players is similar, with Anouck's opponents averaging a 432.84 rank and Julie's a 431.67 rank.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Anouck's past performance indicates a favorable outcome, winning 70% of such sets compared to Julie's 64% success rate.
• How do they fare in converting breakpoints? Anouck is slightly more proficient, converting 42.33% of opportunities, while Julie converts 39.68%.

Editorial Prediction (November 25, 2025, UTC):

As we evaluate the upcoming tennis match, Anouck Vrancken Peeters appears to have a slight edge in several key areas. Her recent form on second serve points, as well as her capability to win more points on her opponent's serve, slightly favors her.

Anouck also seems to manage high-pressure situations adeptly, with a higher breakpoint-saving percentage. Additionally, her performance over the last year has been marginally superior.

Both players demonstrate a strong affinity for indoor hard courts, but differ in their least successful surfaces, which might play a role depending on where the current tournament is held.

In the event of a deciding set, Anouck's historical advantage may give her the upper hand strategically. Given these insights, Anouck Vrancken Peeters is likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.